Hippo CMMS vs Limble
Last Updated:Our analysts compared Hippo CMMS vs Limble based on data from our 400+ point analysis of CMMS Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Product Basics
Pros
|
Cons
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Product Assistance
Product Insights
Product Ranking
Analyst Rating Summary
Analyst Ratings for Functional Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
Analyst Ratings for Technical Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
User Sentiment Summary
Hippo CMMS has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 560 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Limble has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 97% when considering 903 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Awards
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Limble and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Platform Capabilities and Integration and Extensibility. Limble stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews
Users praise Hippo CMMS for its user-friendly interface, efficient mobile apps for technicians, and responsive customer support. Many find it cost-effective compared to feature-rich competitors, but acknowledge it may lack some advanced customization options or in-depth reporting available in high-end CMMS solutions. A key strength highlighted by users is its intuitive design, allowing for quick onboarding and adoption, even for individuals less tech-savvy. Mobile apps are seen as a major differentiator, empowering technicians to work efficiently in the field, improving communication and reducing downtime. Responsive customer support is consistently lauded, ensuring users receive timely assistance when needed. However, some users mention limitations in advanced reporting and customization compared to pricier competitors. While offering pre-built reports and customizable dashboards, they may not cater to highly complex needs or require additional data manipulation for specific insights. Additionally, while offering various integrations, some users wish for deeper, more native integrations with specific software they utilize. Ultimately, user reviews suggest Hippo CMMS excels in offering a user-friendly, cost-effective solution with strong mobile capabilities and excellent support. However, those seeking highly advanced reporting, intricate customization, or deeper integrations with specific software might need to consider alternatives. Deciding factors often boil down to individual needs, budget constraints, and the importance placed on user-friendliness and mobile accessibility.
Limble CMMS helps users generate work orders, maintain schedules, and plan for preventive maintenance. Notable features include tracking, a scheduler and customization. Reviewers also appreciated the hassle-free implementation and top-notch customer support team. In contrast, users indicated that reporting and text alerts weren’t robust enough. The mobile interface lacks functionality and task reassignment could be easier as well. However, the system can be a good fit for businesses that aren’t overly reliant on those features and are looking for an affordable, user-friendly CMMS solution.
Screenshots
Top Alternatives in CMMS Software
Asset Essentials by Brightly
Asset Panda
CHAMPS
eMaint
eWorkOrders
EZOfficeInventory
Fiix
FMX
Fracttal
FTMaintenance
Limble
Maintenance Care
Maintenance Connection
ManagerPlus
ManWinWin
Maxpanda
MicroMain
MPulse
ServiceChannel
UpKeep
Related Categories
Head-to-Head Comparison
FAQ
We’re the employee-owned Austin-based startup democratizing software data so you can make your decisions in an influence-free zone. Our market data is crowdsourced from our user-base of 100,000+ companies.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...