Our analysts compared Aconex vs Corecon based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Construction Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Construction Management Software
Aconex has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 437 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Corecon has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 78% when considering 77 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Oracle Aconex is suitable for large engineering and construction projects, though not so much for smaller operations. Its document management feature impressed most of its users, though many think that its interface isn’t easy to navigate. It does not support cut and paste from external documents to a message. Since it is a web-based module, the efficiency of this application depends on internet connectivity. Users liked that documents could be exported to Excel sheets. Some users complained that it wasn’t very reliable as a system and that they had to continuously refresh the page to make it work.
Corecon is easy to use and has a powerful set of features to handle construction management projects. Exporting and importing data from other tools like Sage/Timberline is easy. Users are pleased with its reporting feature as they allow them to edit reports. It gives users access to databases to create reports. QuickBooks integration isn’t seamless for some users and may get buggy. Users say that it may be fit for a small number of large projects. All the information about client billing and subcontractor work is available in one place. The support team is reasonably helpful.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...