Looking for alternatives to ComputerEase? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Dashboard and Reporting, Mobile Capabilities, and Bonus Management. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real Construction Management Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of ComputerEase to leading industry alternatives like Procore, CoConstruct, eSUB, and Assemble.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Construction Management Software
ComputerEase has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 80% when considering 112 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Procore has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 89% when considering 6694 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
CoConstruct has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 1674 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
eSUB has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 91% when considering 314 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Assemble has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 95 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
ComputerEase is a useful system to track costs for users’ projects and their accounting. Users like how it records expenses easily and lets them set up multiple databases in a group. Some users think that its interface is outdated and could use an update. The reporting feature isn’t very user-friendly as users had to force feed data to create a report and could not send reports from the program itself. With the limited information we had, reviewers didn’t talk about many cons.
Procore's user reviews paint a picture of a powerful construction management software with strengths in centralizing data, improving communication, and streamlining workflows. Users praise its mobile accessibility, robust reporting tools, and collaborative features, citing improved project visibility and reduced paperwork as key benefits. However, some reviewers mention a steeper learning curve compared to simpler options and a higher cost point. One recurring strength is Procore's ability to consolidate information and communication. Users appreciate having a central platform for documents, drawings, discussions, and updates, eliminating the need for multiple tools and email threads. This fosters transparency and reduces miscommunication, as exemplified by a reviewer who mentioned avoiding costly delays due to improved information flow. Another frequently lauded aspect is Procore's mobile app, enabling field teams to capture data, submit reports, and access project information in real-time. This streamlines workflows and eliminates data silos, as highlighted by a reviewer who credited the app with improving efficiency and reducing rework. Procore's reporting and analytics tools are also seen as valuable assets. Users appreciate the ability to generate customizable reports and dashboards, providing valuable insights into project performance, resource allocation, and potential risks. This data-driven approach helps users make informed decisions and improve overall project outcomes. However, some users mention a steeper learning curve compared to more basic software, requiring initial investment in training and user adoption. Additionally, Procore's pricing structure can be a barrier for smaller companies or those with limited budgets, while competitors might offer more affordable options with similar core functionalities. In conclusion, Procore's strengths lie in its ability to centralize data, improve communication, and streamline workflows, making it a valuable tool for complex projects and larger teams. However, its learning curve and cost might pose challenges for smaller companies or those seeking basic functionalities. Ultimately, the decision depends on individual needs, project complexity, and budget considerations.
CoConstruct offers a user-friendly solution for construction businesses to remove ambiguities, streamline operations and enhance productivity. It defines the scope of work, helps delegate tasks to team members, fosters communication with clients and trade partners, provides an overview of all in-progress projects and adapts to business needs. It seamlessly integrates with Quickbooks and keeps track of budgets, project estimations, expenses, billing and invoices. However, the system is challenging to set-up initially. It is hard to implement, requires a steep learning curve to understand its capabilities and backend processes and is slow to respond.
eSUB streamlines project management, provides prompt feedback on projects and simplifies processing change orders and RFI correspondence swiftly. It boosts productivity by delivering accurate information, uploading pictures and communicating with the field staff in real time. Its centralized tracking system monitors job progress from start to finish, stores all work-related information in one place and keeps everyone informed. It is easy to implement, backed by helpful customer support and can be customized to fit a user’s workflows. However, the product has a steep learning curve to get used to its features, doesn’t offer a task reminder function and lacks flexible reporting features. It has limited default areas, logs out several times when idle and its mobile apps offer limited capabilities.
Assemble Insight offers tools to assess a model’s finish and accelerates its takeoff. It helps compare models with drawings and offers the ability to leverage quantities by group, code and quantity. It generates various metrics to track work progress, swiftly extracts relevant information and offers collaborative model visualizations with team members. However, the system doesn’t calculate variations in models accurately, is slow to handle large projects, has a cluttered homepage and cannot be used as a standalone estimation solution.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...