Our analysts compared NueMD vs Tebra EHR based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EHR Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
NueMD is a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline various administrative and clinical tasks for healthcare providers. It excels in managing electronic health records (EHR), medical billing, and practice management. This software is particularly well-suited for small to mid-sized medical practices, as it offers an intuitive interface and robust functionality that can handle the complexities of healthcare administration without overwhelming users.
One of the key benefits of NueMD is its ability to improve workflow efficiency, thereby allowing healthcare professionals to focus more on patient care. Popular features include customizable templates, real-time claim tracking, and integrated scheduling. Users often highlight its ease of use and the quality of customer support as significant advantages.
In terms of pricing, NueMD typically operates on a subscription model, with costs varying based on the number of users and specific features required. This makes it a flexible option for practices of different sizes and needs. Compared to similar products, NueMD is frequently praised for its user-friendly design and comprehensive feature set, making it a strong contender in the EHR market.
among all EHR Software
NueMD has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 485 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Tebra EHR has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 82% when considering 407 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Tebra EHR and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Clinical Documentation, Dashboards and Reporting and Medical Billing.
NueMD is a cloud-based practice management software that offers a suite of features, including medical billing, electronic health records (EHR), and appointment scheduling. While NueMD has been a popular choice for some practices, user reviews from the past year suggest that it may not be the best fit for everyone. One of the biggest strengths of NueMD is its comprehensive suite of features. Users praise the software's ability to handle everything from billing to scheduling, making it a one-stop shop for practice management. However, some users have expressed concerns about the software's user interface, which they find clunky and difficult to navigate. They also complain that the software is not as intuitive as other EHR systems on the market, such as Athenahealth or Kareo. NueMD's customer support has also been a point of contention, with some users reporting long wait times and unhelpful responses. NueMD's biggest differentiator is its focus on medical billing. The software's billing features are highly regarded by users, who appreciate its ability to streamline the billing process and reduce the number of errors. However, NueMD's billing features are not without their drawbacks. Some users have reported that the software's billing system is not as flexible as other systems on the market, making it difficult to customize for specific practice needs. Overall, NueMD is a solid EHR system that offers a comprehensive suite of features. However, its clunky user interface, lack of intuitive design, and inconsistent customer support may make it a less desirable option for some practices. NueMD is best suited for practices that are looking for a system with strong billing features and are willing to put in the time and effort to learn the software. It is important to note that AdvancedMD, the company behind NueMD, is sunsetting the software in 2025. This means that practices using NueMD will need to migrate to a different system in the near future.
With a user interface that’s easy to learn, navigate and get used to, Tebra EHR provides efficiency for clinical facilities. Its cost-effectiveness also sets it apart, according to user feedback. However, it doesn’t support all third-party integrations. Additionally, out-of-date tools and features tend to slow down users. Feedback is balanced regarding billing features and customer support, with some users considering them positives while others view them negatively. Overall, the product can be a good choice for independent medical practitioners.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...