Our analysts compared Jirav vs Jedox based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EPM Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EPM Software
Jirav has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 97% when considering 12 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
Jedox has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 88% when considering 226 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Jirav and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Cash Management, Project Planning and Workforce Planning. Jirav stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Jedox and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Sales Planning.
Is Jirav a jarring experience or a smooth ride for businesses seeking EPM solutions? User reviews from the past year suggest that Jirav is a user-friendly platform that excels in financial forecasting and reporting. Many users praise its intuitive interface, making it easy to navigate and find the features they need. They also highlight its robust reporting capabilities, allowing them to generate insightful financial reports with ease. For example, users have found Jirav particularly helpful in creating detailed cash flow forecasts and budget versus actual reports, providing valuable insights into their financial performance. However, some users have pointed out limitations in Jirav's workforce planning capabilities. While it offers basic features for managing employee data, it lacks the depth and sophistication found in dedicated HR management systems. For instance, Jirav may not be suitable for organizations with complex workforce planning needs, such as those requiring detailed skills tracking or succession planning. Overall, Jirav appears to be a strong contender in the EPM market, particularly for businesses that prioritize financial planning and reporting. Its user-friendly design and robust reporting features make it a valuable tool for finance teams. However, organizations with complex workforce planning requirements may need to consider alternative solutions.
Jedox has garnered a reputation for its robust data modeling capabilities and Excel integration, making it a popular choice for organizations with existing Excel-based processes. Users appreciate the familiar interface and the ability to leverage their existing Excel skills, reducing the learning curve and facilitating user adoption. The platform's strength lies in its ability to handle complex calculations and data manipulations, making it suitable for financial planning, budgeting, and forecasting tasks. However, some users find the interface outdated and less intuitive compared to modern cloud-based solutions. Additionally, while Jedox offers cloud deployment options, its on-premise roots can lead to challenges with scalability and accessibility for remote teams. When compared to competitors like Anaplan and Adaptive Insights, Jedox stands out with its powerful OLAP engine and Excel integration. This makes it a preferred choice for organizations that prioritize data analysis and manipulation capabilities. However, Jedox may fall short in terms of user-friendliness and collaboration features, where cloud-native platforms often excel. The platform's pricing structure, which can be complex and involve multiple components, is another factor that potential users should carefully consider. Ultimately, Jedox is best suited for organizations with strong Excel expertise and a need for advanced data modeling and analytical capabilities, particularly in finance and controlling departments.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...