ApplicantStack vs Oracle Talent Management

Is ApplicantStack the ace up your sleeve when it comes to hiring? Recent user reviews suggest that while ApplicantStack offers a solid foundation for talent management, it may not be the "holy grail" for every organization. Users praise its user-friendly interface and customizable features, particularly highlighting the ease with which they can tailor email templates and set up automated messages throughout the hiring process. However, a recurring gripe is the lack of robust reporting functionality, making it difficult to extract specific insights without manual intervention. For instance, one user expressed frustration at not being able to easily generate a report showing only actively recruiting jobs, necessitating a cumbersome manual review process. While ApplicantStack shines in its core functionality of managing applications, its limitations become apparent when compared to competitors like JobDiva, which users commend for its superior reporting capabilities. This suggests that ApplicantStack might be best suited for smaller to mid-sized companies that prioritize ease of use and customization over advanced analytics. Larger organizations with complex reporting needs might find ApplicantStack's limitations a significant drawback.

Oracle is an overall talent management solution. Performance management was one of its most popular aspects. Users liked the overall management, professional development and skill set defining features. Its employee management, onboarding and talent management worked well aiding in optimizing the workforce. Recruiting was an especially well-liked tool with its ability to check candidate status, pull transcripts and engage in talent sourcing. Last, users were happy with its reporting elements as well. As for reviewer dissatisfaction, the most disliked aspect was the price. It’s a comprehensive and expensive product. This included a lack of adequate skill-based search, poor navigation, problems that arose from internet connections, and an overall feeling of it being too complicated. Many users also experience bugs, glitches and a slow data management process. The initial learning curve was said to be steep, it was hard to navigate, and users disliked the UI and lack of expansive documentation. Overall, this is a good tool for a medium-sized or enterprise company, especially one that’s looking for help recruiting talent and engaging in professional development. Though users should leave time for adapting to its somewhat complicated functionality. For smaller businesses or those with limited budgets, this is likely not the best solution.