Our analysts compared Built for Teams vs OnBlick based on data from our 400+ point analysis of HR Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
among all HR Management Software
Built for Teams has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 1222 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
OnBlick has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 92% when considering 142 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Built for Teams stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
OnBlick stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Is Built for Teams actually built for teams? User reviews from the last year suggest that while Built for Teams offers a solid foundation for HR processes, it may not be the most robust or feature-rich compared to competitors like BambooHR or Namely. Users appreciate the platform's intuitive design and ease of use, particularly for core HR functions like managing employee data, tracking time off, and approving requests. The shared calendar feature, allowing employees to visualize leave time, is frequently cited as a major plus. However, some users find the reporting functionality limited and crave more customization options. Others express a desire for more advanced features, such as performance management tools with in-depth feedback mechanisms or more sophisticated compensation management capabilities. Essentially, Built for Teams seems best suited for smaller organizations or those with relatively straightforward HR needs. Its strength lies in simplifying core HR tasks and centralizing employee information. However, companies with complex requirements or a desire for granular control over HR processes might find Built for Teams lacking. They may be better served exploring alternatives that offer a broader and deeper range of functionalities.
User reviews from the past year suggest that while OnBlick has potential, it's not quite hitting the mark. Users appreciate the software's intuitive interface and robust reporting features, finding it easier to navigate than competitors like BambooHR. For example, users praise OnBlick's ability to generate custom reports on employee performance and turnover, saving them valuable time and effort. However, a recurring gripe is the lack of seamless integration with other popular HR platforms, making it a clunky addition to existing workflows. This is a major drawback for businesses that rely on a suite of HR tools. Ultimately, OnBlick seems best suited for smaller businesses with straightforward HR needs who are looking for a user-friendly platform to manage core HR functions. However, larger organizations or those with more complex requirements might find OnBlick's lack of integrations and limited customization options a dealbreaker.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...